

Its nice to see that we can finaly buy runecoins and membership with in game money,īut that makes new problem. i dont care about 8 spins,īut i want to know whats better to choose. So i just bought 1 bond in ge for 6.5m, witch is nothingĬompared to rewards u can get from that. T H A R K O N 23:51, Septem(UTC) What is best price to choose when using bond? Any item with charges or any kind of information stored in it. There are probably over a hundred items that don't stack in the bank. EscapeTheApe ( talk) 17:49, Septem(UTC) Atleast the clover necklaces share this attribute and I'm pretty sure several other items do too. I removed the part about it being the first item that doesn't stack in the bank. Could someone confirm/correct it for me? Rsshadow ( talk) 17:06, Septem(UTC) However I did the math with €, so I'm not 100% sure the $ price is correct. I've added a little part about Bonds actually being 33% more expensive.

Now, bonds offer a legitimate way to benefit both those with real world money and those with only in game money. If you work out a decent in game money making strategy, you can actually pay for continuous membership with in game money. Whenever a person buys a bond to sell for gold, the person who buys the bond in game can receive membership, Runecoins, or spins without real world wealth. The beauty of bonds is that isn't just like buying gold from bots or even straight from Jagex. Thus, this becomes an issue of ideology (capitalism, which is very clearly shown in modern society that not all have equal opportunity for success) that supercedes the controversy of an artificial economy! Achiox 15:20, Septem(UTC) I haven't been keeping track with current discussion on the ethics of such Bonds, but the fact is that those who have a larger disposable income in real life gain an (arguably) unfair advantage over those who don't have the same resources. However, where's the end to this? The game was designed so that as long as you met a certain level of affluence in real life, you had access to all parts of the game (flat rate membership fee). I support being able to buy gold as well. Why force players to spend unhealthy amounts of time in game just to enjoy the best content? -The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.121.9.44 ( talk) on 09:41, September 26, 2013. I personally support the concept of buying gold - it's silly for me to farm gold when I can spend the same time doing work in the real world, make real money, and just buy far more gold that I could have earned in that time. Extreme133 ( talk) 17:05, Septem(UTC)Įh, EVE Online has virtually the same thing with their PLEX, and that game is just fine. I see controversy brewing on the horizon if it hasn't already. 04ismailjj6 ( talk) 16:04, Septem(UTC) Never mind, I misunderstood. They could easily pour more money into the game than the gold farming bots ever could. There are plenty of people willing to spend in excess of thousands of real pounds for in-game currency and tens of thousands more who will happily buy a few hundred pound to make a quick billion. So how does this help combat inflation? The exchange rate is effectively 5M Gp for £1 and will probably increase. Indeed, you buy a Bond with real money, then find a player in-game who wants to buy the Bond from you for coins. Am I understanding this correctly? 04ismailjj6 ( talk) 15:36, Septem(UTC) The bonds are bought with real money (£3) then traded in-game for gp (determined by the GE Price). So now it's possible to directly buy gp officially? 16 Minor question about well of goodwill donation.

